Friday, January 31, 2025

Timorous Beastie 24, Benrinnes 12, Compass Box M&L 1, Craigellachie 15, Talisker 18; Malts!

Timorous Beastie 24, Sherried Edition 46.8%
A Douglas Laing production of the Highland blended malts no less than 24 years old, this one was aged in sherry. Components unknown but are all from Highland as per the theme. The nose is black currant berry, some alcohol, dark tea. Palate is sweet, cocoa-forward, yet not overwhelming and surprisingly thin in texture. Some cinnamon and orange peel round off the palate. The aftertaste is medium long with more or less whatever was in the palate rounded off and finished by the sweet vanilla and a malt hug with an absolute miniscule touch of ashy smoke in the very tail end. Overall: Enjoyable and mouth-watering, this is an imminently-consumable pour that is deceptively complex, but at the same time doesn’t quite evoke my need to dissect its layers that are perhaps too jammed together to be dissectable. It’s enjoyable for what it is nonetheless. Value: Picked up at $109… I’ll say yes, value’s there for the age for sure
Score: B+

Benrinnes 12, Mahler-Besse, Rum Cask 56.2%
A plantation rum cask bottling of Benrinnes… Color-wise is very pale straw which suggests the cask was at least once refilled. Likely ex-bourbon to age rum, then this. The nose is very sweet apples and tropical fruit compote with a note of apple brandy weaving through. WIth a bit of time the palate settles down yet still keeps few notes around the edges. The palate got marzipan, vanilla cake, surprising amount of chili heat and baking spices leaning towards peppers and chilies. Aftertaste is more enjoyable than the palate for me, with orchard and tropic fruits again and gently fading heat. Overall: For a 12 year old in rum cask this is by no mean a slouch on the flavor department but it doesn’t quite move a needle on the ‘remarkable’ or ‘must have’ sort of bottling. Value: Acquired at 80… Not a bad value for the price.
Score: B

Compass Box Myths and Legends 1, Balblair, 46%
The nose got some light honey and orchard fruits, with a touch of melons in the mix, quite floral. The palate isn’t very complicated. Light vanilla, toasted grain, good dollop of white pepper. The same light flowers and melon notes underpin the palate experience. Aftertaste lingers for a while with light oak, more peppers and rounded maltiness. A touch of savoriness rounds off the experience. No water needed here. Overall: Efficiently executed, this draws unfortunate comparisons to balblair 2005 i have on the shelf as they are very similar to each other. Functional, drinkable, enjoyable, if a touch too green-wood oak forward in the blending this a quality pour for a casual conversation. Value: ~150 msrp when it got released originally … Pretty bottle but overpriced.
Score: B+

Craigellachie 15, Old Malt Cask, K&L SP, 52.2%
Cask #HL20936, Old Malt Cask. Hunter Laing, distilled in 2009 and bottled in 2024 for K&L wines, refill sherry hogshead. Sherried speysider? Yup! Dark chocolate and very toasty caramel on the nose. Palate is very clearly chocolate covered raisins, and perhaps some other dark berries covered in chocolate, blueberries perhaps while dusted on top with chili powder. Medium length aftertaste that’s both pleasant yet lacking any distinct character from the aforementioned notes. The dark chocolate berry notes fade first, then the chili and baking spices. Overall: A competent and a confident bottling with all the earmarks of the modern whiskey profile, this doesn’t disappoint across the board by lacking flavor or having bad notes in it. This isn’t a subtle pour that hides in the layers, but an impact on the palate. At the same time, I’m feeling that it lacks some of the complexity to elevate it beyond that. That being said, it’s just fine, an enjoyable sherried, generic, speysider at cask proof with nothing to really complain about. Value: Sold at $109 from K&L it’s a reasonable value these days to fill a spot for sherried malt in your collection.
Score: B+

Talisker 18, 45.8%
An original Talisker bottling… Thank you friend Mark. If I’m reading the laser code right it’s from ‘22. Smoked red fruits on the nose, cherries, and perhaps a touch of prune, a note of tobacco. The peat isn’t overwhelming the palate with lots of fruits still showing through. It alternates between sweet and nutty to somewhat smoky and drying depending on the sip and timing. The palate flip-flop always pulls towards the other side of the spectrum from where it started on a particular sip. Notes of pepper and a salty-sweet composition round off the experience. The long aftertaste with slightly numbing pepperiness follows without being too spicy. Couple of drops of water make it slightly sweeter to round off the somewhat salty peat and peppery character. This is very welcome as I was wishing it was just a touch less dry out of the bottle. Overall: A classy and somewhat old-school dram, this is akin to being on an average-ish old time sailboat. There’s nothing wrong with a classic but there are better options that offer more. Value: $180 at total wine. I’m not paying it. Get it at a bar if the price is right.
Score: B


Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown

Saturday, January 25, 2025

Heaven Hills, Sweeten’s Cove, Subtle Spirits, Frey Ranch, MGP Light Whiskey and Bourbons

Tiny Samples First, thanks friend Jason!:

Bluegrass Distillers, Elkwood Reserve 15, Kentucky, 58% — These come as single casks so your experience may vary… Woody, sweet, punchy, somewhat spicy. This is classic bourbon through and through. Well balanced, if slightly hot, sipper. — Score: Yay-
Four Gate, Seelbach’s? SP, Toasted Barrell, Heaven Hill, ~60% — Nutty, high proof. Quite woody, little corny, spicy, the usual. Seems to lack a truly enjoyable bourbon depth and texture. That being said it’s almost too easy to drink. Would enjoy a bottle — Score: Yay-
Quixotic Spirits Rebirth; Heaven Hill, 64.8% — Minty. Woody, perhaps too woody. Spicy, warming, velvet texture. Not overpowering for the proof, being surprisingly gentle. Fantastic front to back. — Score: Yay

Sweeten’s Cove “Specialty Release 2021” (Dickel), 56.48%
A true Dickel blend of different ages with high proof. Dickel is a polarizing distillate. Many associate it with Flintstone’s vitamins, especially those that had those. For me it just typically tastes nutty bad… or flowery good. This one happens to lean towards flowers; a small win I guess. Toasted wood and cologne on the nose. Slightly nutty but not offensive, well-balanced palate, dry oak, baking spices, black pepper. Aftertaste lingers for a bit with dried orange peel, little pepper and cinnamon, backed by toasted wood and some vanilla. Overall: Certainly one of the better (possibly best) Dickel bottlings I’ve had, it leaves little to complain about provided you fundamentally enjoy the peanuts-or-flowers profile. In this case it’s dry oranges, oak, and balanced baking spices. Value: Picked this up at $30 on clearance. Avoid at 160 MSRP.
Score: B+

Sweetens Cove “Kennessee”, 55.35%
A brief one: This is a blend of Dickel (Tennessee) and Undisclosed Kentucky bourbons in a secret proportion, “finished with toasted sugar maple wood”. That’s from the bottle. Little maple-sweet note on the nose, backed by strong alcohol. This is a younger blend here. The nose is surprisingly Kentucky once the maple dissipates. I’m going to skip describing and go straight to: Overall: It’s a decent Dickel and Kentucky blend. Nothing more, nothing less, it’s exactly as it sounds. The peanuts are somewhat balanced by the Kentucky spice in the blend but are still there. Mix 1792 and Dickel BiB together and this is what you get. Somewhat sweeter than typical faire due to sugar maple finish which makes it both more and less tolerable depending on mood and what you are tasting in the glass from Dickel DNA. Value: Picked up for $10 on clearance. Not worth it at MSRP of about 60.
Score: C+

Subtle Spirits Bourbon (MGP) #77, 57.8%
MGP distillate aged 10 years. Smells very nice, bourbon, distinct tobacco note on the nose too. Layered complexity in the palate, steeped black tea, balanced sugars and cinnamon, toasted vanilla. Surprisingly gentle for the proof. Long aftertaste with more or less whatever was on the palate unchanged, just lingering for a while. Overall: It’s really really good. Arguably one of the more enjoyable and balanced bourbons in a while for me. Value: Priced at $129… it’s a maybe? considering that 10 year MGP is hard to come by.
https://shop.subtles … le-spirits-selection
Score: A

Frey Ranch Bourbon, Starrs & Staves SP, 60.50%
Barrel #1260. Frey Ranch just outputs excellent stuff all around. Dark caramel, lots of toasted wood, depth of flavor that belies age. The nose is sweet with dry pencil shavings and alcohol. Palate is all toasted wood, orange oil, lots of very very dark caramel, cinnamon. The palate hangs around for medium-long time and gently fades from the palate, no surprises there. Overall: Youngish bourbon par-excellence. Easy counterpart to best of 5 year old SAOS few years back by being woodier and darker with saos being sweeter and cinnamon forward. An excellent drinker. Value: These are usually ~$99 which is a somewhat reasonable price for the quality
Score: A-

MGP Light Whiskey 18 year old, James Vo SP, 75%
A hazmat! A light whiskey from MGP pick by James, called “Annual Gift Man Presents X-MAS Special”. This is a private cask select. No information about it online. Barreled in 2005 and bottled in 2023. Nose is similar to a sweet cologne. The palate start gentle for the proof but then kicks into overdrive on the alcohol in the secondaries. Deceptively powerful but not overwhelming. Lots of sweet vanilla, brown sugars, hot cinnamon. Water brings out depth of oak and baking spices. Overall: Proofy but very enjoyable, especially with a touch of water. There’s little not to like here. Value: N/A, a gifted open bottle.
Score: B+ (w/ water)


Scoring Breakdown: https://www.aerin.or … age=scores_breakdown